On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 03:07:36PM -0500, Mike Ajemian wrote:
> 1.  Inprise JBuilder, sitting on top of JDK that Inprise authored.
>     Good brand.  Not involving Blackdown as the market might perceive
>     that as a dilution (I know finance folks who would view the
>     relationship as a major liability.)  That's it.  It's not
>     specifically about the JDK, that's a component in the solution.
>     It's about the packaging of Java tools from Inprise and selling
>     those tools to (especially) corporate buyers who are still twitchy
>     about Linux.  For the corporate tools builder (IT departments are
>     potential customers who stand out to me), they might want Linux if
>     somebody supplied all the Java tools and supported them, too.  So
>     Inprise supplies all the tools and supports all the components,
>     too.  I know corporations that make decisions this way and it's
>     not a bad thing.  Integrated components, one point-of-contact.
>     The market assigns a lot of value to that.

I just want to point out that the JDK is already "branded" by Sun and that
Blackdown has been officially appointed by Sun as the official porter. For a
lot of companies this is more than enough. 
As I said many times before, we turned to the JDK to fix a specific need. We
knew that JDK 1.3 was going to be ported by Sun but we needed something for
the short term. 


-- 
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to