Hi Dan, I suppose this could be one of our problems, Could this "illegal instruction" problem listed here be the cause of our sig 11 errors? (there is no mention of -i "illegal" in any of the error files that the JVM saves on each crash).
The "patch_final" link at the bottom of this page doesn't work, and I tried applying the contextual diffs to RH 7.3 (2.4.18-03), but most of them failed. Craig On Thu, 23 May 2002, Dan Kegel wrote: > That reminds me: there is another important patch > for x86 SMP. It has not yet been blessed by Red Hat, though. > See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102208353523931&w=2 > - Dan > > Calvin Austin wrote: > > > > There is a very important patch to Redhat 7.2 SMP kernel, you need the > > 2.4.9-31smp patch available under 'security patches' from redhat.com > > > > Unpatched redhat 7.2 SMP will create duplicate process ids. That is not good! > > The bug is also fixed in 2.4.18 kernels. Hui Huang tracked this down a while > > back > > > > regards > > calvin > > > > Jesse Stockall wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 04:44, Craig O'Shannessy wrote: > > > > > > > > Sun JDK 1.4.0 > > > > Sun JDK 1.3.1 > > > > Sun JDK 1.3.1_03 > > > > IBM JDK 1.3.1_01 (had to use "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" for smp machine) > > > > Blackdown JDK 1.3.1_01 (both native and green threads, both give sig 11) > > > > > > In my experience you should always be using "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" > > > with any of these JRE's and RH 7.2. (It was mentioned in the release > > > notes for RH 7.1) > > > > > > I run Blackdown's and Sun's 1.3.1 on Debian & RH both single & dual cpu > > > & have never encountered any of the problems you seem to be having. Well > > > I used to get the odd crash & many defunct java processes, but they were > > > resolved after setting "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5". > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
