> On Tuesday 28 September 2010 3:38:36 pm haipeng du wrote: >> Which one I should use? They are both from Apache. What is big difference? >> Thank. > Funny this wasn't asked on the CXF lists as well... :-) > > See: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1243247/difference-between-apache-cxf-and-axis/1245386#1245386 > > I would recommend CXF. It's more stable, generally easier to work with, > performs just as good if not better, has a MUCH better track > record of supporting their users (aka: getting fixes to bugs released) and is > much more "standards based" from an API standpoint. Good work, thanks for using Axis2 mailing list to promote CXF (feel sorry about them ;-) ). I know this is not the first time that CXF uses Axis2 mailing list to promote their project, but what to (I know they will definitely do that in the future). One of the good measure to look at the usability and popularity of a project is the download statistics, so anyone can just look at the following two links and decide it the truth.
http://people.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/projects/cxf.html http://people.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/projects/axis2.html Axis2 has higher number of open issues, that does not mean project is bad or does not support the user request, most important thing is we have fixed most of the critical issues, for example we have fixed all the issues up to AXIS2-1300, you can also judge that by simply looking at the JIRA list. Deepal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
