Well, I've been pretty open about reporting the Axis2 weaknesses I've
found. This latest one discussed in the article seems to be a code
generation issue, and may be the same as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4065 (which has been open
for more than two years, apparently without any follow-up). I'll add my
own examples in separate Jiras. I also said in my response to Thomas
that he might try attaching the policy directly to the message
structure, rather than relying on the code generation to handle this, as
a way of making it work with Axis2.

The inability to use WS-Policy 1.5 (at least for code generation) is a
separate issue I've brought up on this list recently. Hopefully that's
an easy fix, and perhaps it can be added for 1.5.3.

  - Dennis

On 11/03/2010 04:32 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> I am more interested in fixing gaps in Axis2. I have no issues in
> learning the weaknesses, but I would rather fix them, rather than
> encouraging users to use others. 
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Dennis Sosnoski <d...@sosnoski.com
> <mailto:d...@sosnoski.com>> wrote:
>
>     If the consensus of the Axis2 developers is to avoid any
>     discussion of other alternatives on these lists I'll certainly
>     respect that. But unless there is a policy to that effect I'll
>     continue to mention other open source alternatives to people if it
>     looks like Axis2 won't fulfill their requirements.
>
>       - Dennis
>
>
>
>     On 11/03/2010 03:41 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Dennis Sosnoski <d...@sosnoski.com
>>     <mailto:d...@sosnoski.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Thomas,
>>
>>         I haven't had any luck with one-way security policies using
>>         Axis2,
>>         though I didn't try this particular combination. You might
>>         find my
>>         latest Java Web Services article on devWorks of interest:
>>         http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws18/index.html
>>         This
>>         one covers WS-Policy in some detail, and includes my tests
>>         with some
>>         one-way policies. Your case is simpler than the ones I used,
>>         so you
>>         might find that CXF or Metro would work for what you want.
>>
>>
>>     Why are we advertising CFX and Metro on Axis2 list??? Should we
>>     not use their own lists to do that???
>>
>>
>>         You could also try attaching the policies directly to the
>>         actual Axis2
>>         message object in your client code (rather than including
>>         them in the
>>         WSDL for client code generation), and see if that works.
>>
>>          - Dennis
>>
>>         --
>>         Dennis M. Sosnoski
>>         Java SOA and Web Services
>>         Axis2/CXF/Metro Training and Consulting
>>         http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
>>         Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
>>
>>
>>         On 10/21/2010 07:26 AM, Thomas J Pinkl wrote:
>>         > I'm trying to consume a web service using Axis2 1.4.1 and
>>         Rampart 1.4.
>>         > The service requires WS-Security in the form of a signed
>>         request (no
>>         > encryption), using x.509 tokens.
>>         >
>>         > I generated the client code from a WSDL file provided by
>>         the service.
>>         > Unfortunately, it did not contain any security anotations.
>>         >
>>         > I am able to send a valid request to the service but I'm
>>         having a
>>         > problem with the response.
>>         >
>>         > The response from the web service is NOT signed or
>>         encrypted.  However,
>>         > my attempts at configuring a policy file where the security
>>         is one-way,
>>         > have been unsuccessful.
>>         >
>>         > With my current policy, I receive an AxisFault while
>>         processing the
>>         > response:
>>         >
>>         >   org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: Missing wsse:Security header
>>         in request
>>         >     at
>>         
>> org.apache.rampart.handler.RampartReceiver.setFaultCodeAndThrowAxisFault(RampartReceiver.java:166)
>>         >     at
>>         
>> org.apache.rampart.handler.RampartReceiver.invoke(RampartReceiver.java:99)
>>         >     at org.apache.axis2.engine.Phase.invoke(Phase.java:317)
>>         >     at
>>         org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.invoke(AxisEngine.java:264)
>>         >     at
>>         org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.receive(AxisEngine.java:163)
>>         >     at
>>         
>> org.apache.axis2.description.OutInAxisOperationClient.handleResponse(OutInAxisOperation.java:363)
>>         >     at
>>         
>> org.apache.axis2.description.OutInAxisOperationClient.send(OutInAxisOperation.java:416)
>>         >     at
>>         
>> org.apache.axis2.description.OutInAxisOperationClient.executeImpl(OutInAxisOperation.java:228)
>>         >     at
>>         
>> org.apache.axis2.client.OperationClient.execute(OperationClient.java:163)
>>         >     at ...
>>         >
>>         > I've tried removing the "Security" phase from InFlow and
>>         InFaultFlow
>>         > in my axis2.xml file, but it seems that Rampart is still
>>         invoked.
>>         >
>>         > Can anyone suggest how I can consume this lopsided
>>         (security-wise)
>>         > service?
>>         >
>>         >
>>
>>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org
>>         <mailto:java-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org>
>>         For additional commands, e-mail:
>>         java-user-h...@axis.apache.org
>>         <mailto:java-user-h...@axis.apache.org>
>>
>>     Samisa ...
>>
>>     http://samisa-abeysinghe.blogspot.com/ 
>>
>>
> Samisa ...
>
> http://samisa-abeysinghe.blogspot.com/ 
>
>

Reply via email to