Either way it is nice to submit a JIRAs, for encountered issues or for ENH 
requests, this way it has a chance of being addressed...

From: Philippe A. [mailto:futhar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:22 AM
To: java-user@axis.apache.org
Subject: Re: [rampart-1.5.2] supported standards

Here's another documentation request. It would be very nice to document what 
parts of the standards are implemented by Rampart/Axis (or which aren't, 
whichever is easier to document). It would make users's lives easier.

For example, I tried using sp:EncryptBeforeSigning with my sp:SymmetricBinding. 
It did not work. The request makes it to the server. The client faults on the 
response. Is it because of a bug or because it is not supported? There is no 
way for me to tell.
2012/4/17 Philippe A. <futhar...@gmail.com<mailto:futhar...@gmail.com>>
Please also note that said page lists some specifications twice.
WS Security Policy

 *   WS-SecurityPolicy 
1.1<http://specs.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy/ws-securitypolicy.pdf>

Web Services Trust Language (WS-Trust)

 *   WS Trust 1.0 <http://specs.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/trust/WS-Trust.pdf>

WS Secure Conversation

 *   WS Secure Conversation 1.0 
<http://specs.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/sc/WS-SecureConversation.pdf>

WS-SX specifications

 *   WS-SecurityPolicy 1.2 
<http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-os.pdf>
 *   WS Trust 
1.3<http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/ws-trust-1.3-os.pdf>
 *   WS Secure Conversation 
1.3<http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512/ws-secureconversation-1.3-os.pdf>

2012/4/13 Philippe A. <futhar...@gmail.com<mailto:futhar...@gmail.com>>

Hello,

Is it possible to confirm that the list of specifications given here are up to 
date and supported by Rampart 1.5.2 (with Axis 1.5.6)?
http://axis.apache.org/axis2/java/rampart/specifications.html

I would suggest to include some indication of when that page was last updated, 
be it a date or version number.

Thanks,

--
Philippe

Reply via email to