On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Raf <r.ventag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mike, > thank you for your answer. > > I have downloaded lucene-core-2.9-dev and I have executed my tests (both on > multireader and on consolidated index) using this new version, but the > performance are very similar to the previous ones. > The big index is 7/8 times faster than multireader version.
Hmmm, interesting! Can you provide more details about your tests? EG the code fragment showing your query, the creation of the MultiReader, how you run the search, etc.? Is the field that you're applying the RangeFilter on highly unique or rather redundant? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
