Ahhh, OK, perhaps that explains the sizable perf difference you're seeing w/ optimized vs not. I'm curious to see the results of your "merge each month into 1 index" test...
Mike On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Roberto Franchini <ro.franch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael McCandless > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> Hmm then I'm a bit baffled again. >> >> Because, each of your "by month" indexes presumably has a unique >> subset of terms for the "date_doc" field? Meaning, a given "by month" >> index will have all date_doc corresponding to that month, and a >> different "by month" index would presumably have no overlap in the >> terms for the date_doc field. > > Yes and no :) In this situation: > >>> 200901-->index1, index2 >>> 200902-->index3 >>> 200903-->index4,index5,index6 > > each month does not overlap with each other, but index1 and index2 > overlap, and so index4 with 5 and 6. So there's overlapping inside a > single month. > So I want to trie, next week, this one: >>> 200901-->index12 (merge of 1 and 2) >>> 200902-->index3 >>> 200903-->index456 (merge of 4,5,6) > > This way we avoid overlapping inside a single month. Maybe this can > help: stay tuned :) > R. > > > -- > Roberto Franchini > http://www.celi.it > http://www.blogmeter.it > http://www.memesphere.it > Tel +39-011-6600814 > jabber:ro.franch...@gmail.com skype:ro.franchini > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
