> If I make a patch that adds verbosity to what BS is doing, can you run > it & post the output?
can do, it can take some time ----- Original Message ---- > From: Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 20:54:25 > Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM, eks devwrote: > > > >> Weird. Have you run CheckIndex? > > nope, I guess it brings nothing: two times built index; Bug provoked by > changing one parameter that controls only search caused it => no corrupt > index? > > > > You think we should give it a try? Hell, why not :) > > Yah it's quite a long shot but if it is corrupt, we'll be kicking > ourselves about 30 emails from now... > > > What do you mean by "Can you do a binary search to locate the term(s) > > that's > causing it?" > > > > I know exactly which term combination causes it, last Query.toString() I > > have > sent.... if I simplify Query by dropping one term with its expansions, it > runs > fine... or if I replace any of these terms it works fine,We tried with higer > freq. terms, lower... everything fine... bizzar > > Right I meant try to whittle down the query that tickles the infinite > loop. Sounds like any whittling causes the issue to scurry away. > > If I make a patch that adds verbosity to what BS is doing, can you run > it & post the output? > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
