Thank you! So the best thing to do is to add the first boolean query as a MUST, and the second query as a should? Even if both of them query the same fields? Will it actually be faster?
On 6 July 2010 11:35, Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Can_Lucene_do_a_.22search_within_search.22.2C_so_that_the_second_search_is_constrained_by_the_results_of_the_first_query.3F > > -- > Ian. > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, liat oren <oren.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is it possible to run a search over top 100,000 (for example) results of > a > > prior search. > > So if the user first does the search, gets results, if pressing on the > > search button again, I would like it to run on the top 100,000 results. > > > > Thanks, > > Liat > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
