Ok, thanks, I will try that On 6 July 2010 11:57, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Both must be "must", else it makes no sense. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: liat oren [mailto:oren.l...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:53 AM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Search on top x results > > > > Thank you! > > > > So the best thing to do is to add the first boolean query as a MUST, and > the > > second query as a should? > > Even if both of them query the same fields? > > Will it actually be faster? > > > > > > On 6 July 2010 11:35, Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene- > > java/LuceneFAQ#Can_Lucene_do_a_.22search > > > > > _within_search.22.2C_so_that_the_second_search_is_constrained_by_the > > _r > > > esults_of_the_first_query.3F > > > > > > -- > > > Ian. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, liat oren <oren.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Is it possible to run a search over top 100,000 (for example) > > > > results of > > > a > > > > prior search. > > > > So if the user first does the search, gets results, if pressing on > > > > the search button again, I would like it to run on the top 100,000 > results. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Liat > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
