As Mike said, this is an intended change. The test
passed in 3.5 because there was no check if
Span queries were working on a field that supported
them. In 4.x this is checked and an error is thrown.

Best
Erick


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Yonghui Zhao <zhaoyong...@gmail.com>wrote:

> In our old code, we create the filed like this.
>
>                Field metaField = new Field(name,strVal,fldDef.store,
> Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS);
>                 metaField.setOmitNorms(true);
>                 *metaField.setIndexOptions(IndexOptions.DOCS_ONLY);*
>                 luceneDoc.add(metaField);
>
>
> The test case is quite simple, it only checks numhits.
>
>   public void testSpanTermQuery() throws Exception {
>     String req = "{\"query\":{\"span_term\":{\"color\":\"red\"}}}";
>     JSONObject res = search(new JSONObject(req));
>     assertEquals("numhits is wrong", 2160, res.getInt("numhits"));
>   }
>
> The query is interpreted to   "return new SpanTermQuery(new Term(field,
> spanterm));"
>
> In lucene 3.5 no exception is found and test is passed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2013/8/13 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
>
> > All span queries require positions to work; older Lucene released
> > failed to catch you if you tried to use a span query on a field that
> > did not index positions, but now Lucene 4.x does catch you (this is an
> > improvement).
> >
> > You should double check your unit test: it really should not have been
> > passing in Lucene 3.5 if it did not index positions ...
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Yonghui Zhao <zhaoyong...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > One of my UT is passed In lucene 3.5, but it is failed in lucene4.3.
> > > The exception is:
> > >
> > > IllegalStateException("field \"" + term.field() + "\" was indexed
> without
> > > position data; cannot run SpanTermQuery (term=" + term.text() + ")");
> > >
> > >
> > > After I change index option of the field from DOCS_ONLY to
> > > DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS, the test is passed.
> > >
> > > I am wondering what's the reason of this limit in lucene 4.3.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to