OK I see why your test in 3.5 was passing: if you just run SpanTermQuery alone, the hit count will be correct, because it never needs to access positions (I suspect?).
Ie, a SpanTermQuery alone is like running TermQuery. It's when SpanTermQuery is used inside other SpanQuerys that positions will be needed, and your 3.5 should fail at that point. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Yonghui Zhao <zhaoyong...@gmail.com> wrote: > In our old code, we create the filed like this. > > Field metaField = new Field(name,strVal,fldDef.store, > Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS); > metaField.setOmitNorms(true); > *metaField.setIndexOptions(IndexOptions.DOCS_ONLY);* > luceneDoc.add(metaField); > > > The test case is quite simple, it only checks numhits. > > public void testSpanTermQuery() throws Exception { > String req = "{\"query\":{\"span_term\":{\"color\":\"red\"}}}"; > JSONObject res = search(new JSONObject(req)); > assertEquals("numhits is wrong", 2160, res.getInt("numhits")); > } > > The query is interpreted to "return new SpanTermQuery(new Term(field, > spanterm));" > > In lucene 3.5 no exception is found and test is passed. > > > > > > > 2013/8/13 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> > >> All span queries require positions to work; older Lucene released >> failed to catch you if you tried to use a span query on a field that >> did not index positions, but now Lucene 4.x does catch you (this is an >> improvement). >> >> You should double check your unit test: it really should not have been >> passing in Lucene 3.5 if it did not index positions ... >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Yonghui Zhao <zhaoyong...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > One of my UT is passed In lucene 3.5, but it is failed in lucene4.3. >> > The exception is: >> > >> > IllegalStateException("field \"" + term.field() + "\" was indexed without >> > position data; cannot run SpanTermQuery (term=" + term.text() + ")"); >> > >> > >> > After I change index option of the field from DOCS_ONLY to >> > DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS, the test is passed. >> > >> > I am wondering what's the reason of this limit in lucene 4.3. >> > >> > Thanks >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
