Hi Tim.

Thanks for your help.  I had a friend provide me some code (some snippets 
below) that could dump the supposed matching spans (this provided some more 
insight).  Perhaps, some of my findings could help someone potentially fix the 
bug.

So, I added my 2 documents

public static String [] DOCS = {
  "bauthors  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  bfname  darin william 
efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  fulford elname slname  bfname  
darby efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  
bfname  darby efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors",
  "bauthors  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  bfname  darin efname sfname 
 eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname fulford elname slname bfname darin efname 
sfname eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors",
 };

I then coded the following SpanQuery.

  // Simple query for fname:darin and lname:fulford 
  ArrayList<SpanQuery> innerSpans = new ArrayList<SpanQuery>();
  
  // Construct the last name span
  ArrayList<SpanQuery> spansln = new ArrayList<SpanQuery>();
  spansln.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "blname")));
  spansln.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "fulford")));    
  spansln.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "elname")));
  
  SpanNearQuery lnInnerIncludeQuery = new SpanNearQuery(spansln.toArray(new 
SpanQuery[spansln.size()]), Integer.MAX_VALUE, true);   
  // Add the sep marker to the not clause
  SpanQuery lnInnerExcludeQuery = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", 
"slname"));
  innerSpans.add(new SpanNotQuery(lnInnerIncludeQuery,lnInnerExcludeQuery));
  
  // Construct the first name span
  ArrayList<SpanQuery> spansfn = new ArrayList<SpanQuery>();
  spansfn.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "bfname")));
  spansfn.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "darin")));    
  spansfn.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "efname")));
  SpanNearQuery fnInnerIncludeQuery = new SpanNearQuery(spansfn.toArray(new 
SpanQuery[spansfn.size()]), Integer.MAX_VALUE, true);   
  // Add the sep marker to the not clause
  SpanQuery fnInnerExcludeQuery = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", 
"sfname"));
  innerSpans.add(new SpanNotQuery(fnInnerIncludeQuery,fnInnerExcludeQuery));
  
  // Make the first/last name spans unordered
  SpanNearQuery innerSpanQuery = new SpanNearQuery(innerSpans.toArray(new 
SpanQuery[innerSpans.size()]), Integer.MAX_VALUE, false);
  
  ArrayList<SpanQuery> outerSpanQuery = new ArrayList<SpanQuery>();
  outerSpanQuery.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "bauthor")));
  outerSpanQuery.add(innerSpanQuery);
  outerSpanQuery.add(new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "eauthor")));
  SpanNearQuery includeQuery = new SpanNearQuery(outerSpanQuery.toArray(new 
SpanQuery[outerSpanQuery.size()]), Integer.MAX_VALUE, true);
   
  // Add the sep marker to the not clause
  SpanQuery excludeQuery = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("content", "sauthor"));
  SpanNotQuery finalQuery = new SpanNotQuery(includeQuery,excludeQuery);  
  doSpanQuery(finalQuery, searcher, "fname:darin AND lname:fulford"); 

And noticed this incorrectly matches  DOC 4 (results are below).

BEGIN QUERY (fname:darin AND lname:fulford): spanNot(spanNear([content:bauthor, 
spanNear([spanNot(spanNear([content:blname, content:fulford, content:elname], 
2147483647, true), content:slname, 0, 0), spanNot(spanNear([content:bfname, 
content:darin, content:efname], 2147483647, true), content:sfname, 0, 0)], 
2147483647, false), content:eauthor], 2147483647, true), content:sauthor, 0, 0)
Score Doc: doc=5 score=1.0829407 shardIndex=-1
'bauthors  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  bfname  darin efname sfname  
eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname fulford elname slname bfname darin efname 
sfname eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors'

Score Doc: doc=4 score=0.610962 shardIndex=-1
'bauthors  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  bfname  darin william efname 
sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  fulford elname slname  bfname  darby 
efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  bfname  
darby efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors'

Doc: 4 Start: 1 End: 12
Doc: 5 Start: 1 End: 11
Doc: 5 Start: 12 End: 22
END QUERY (fname:darin AND lname:fulford): spanNot(spanNear([content:bauthor, 
spanNear([spanNot(spanNear([content:blname, content:fulford, content:elname], 
2147483647, true), content:slname, 0, 0), spanNot(spanNear([content:bfname, 
content:darin, content:efname], 2147483647, true), content:sfname, 0, 0)], 
2147483647, false), content:eauthor], 2147483647, true), content:sauthor, 0, 0)

I then made one small change (made this SpanNearQuery 'ordered')

// Make the first/last name spans ordered
  SpanNearQuery innerSpanQuery = new SpanNearQuery(innerSpans.toArray(new 
SpanQuery[innerSpans.size()]), Integer.MAX_VALUE, true);

And I get the correct results.

BEGIN QUERY (fname:darin AND lname:fulford): spanNot(spanNear([content:bauthor, 
spanNear([spanNot(spanNear([content:blname, content:fulford, content:elname], 
2147483647, true), content:slname, 0, 0), spanNot(spanNear([content:bfname, 
content:darin, content:efname], 2147483647, true), content:sfname, 0, 0)], 
2147483647, true), content:eauthor], 2147483647, true), content:sauthor, 0, 0)
Score Doc: doc=5 score=0.76575476 shardIndex=-1
'bauthors  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  bfname  darin efname sfname  
eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname fulford elname slname bfname darin efname 
sfname eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors'

Doc: 5 Start: 12 End: 22
END QUERY (fname:darin AND lname:fulford): spanNot(spanNear([content:bauthor, 
spanNear([spanNot(spanNear([content:blname, content:fulford, content:elname], 
2147483647, true), content:slname, 0, 0), spanNot(spanNear([content:bfname, 
content:darin, content:efname], 2147483647, true), content:sfname, 0, 0)], 
2147483647, true), content:eauthor], 2147483647, true), content:sauthor, 0, 0)

Not sure why 'ordered' vs 'unordered' makes it work correctly, but certainly 
sounds like a bug with Lucene. 

If you have any thoughts for a workaround, I would be interested.

Thanks again.

Darin.







----- Original Message -----
From: "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org>
To: Darin McBeath <ddmcbe...@yahoo.com>; "java-user@lucene.apache.org" 
<java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: SpanQuery not working as expected

Darin,
  I confirmed the behavior you reported.  This is probably the same bug that 
was reported in LUCENE-5331. The trigger there seems to be multiple examples of 
the same token (which you have plenty of).  I tested with just this:

[[darin fulford]~100 sauthor]!~0,0

darin fulford (non-directional) but no intervening sauthor

And that works correctly.

I also tested:
[[darin fulford]~100 (bauthor sauthor)]!~0,0

Same as above but with a SpanOr for bauthor|sauthor. And that works correctly, 
too.

So, yes, I think what you've found is a bug, unfortunately a known one that 
hasn't been fixed.  There's also a chance that something else is going 
on...when I took your query and removed b[lf]name and e[fl]name, the query 
still brought back both docs.  So, if you want to go this route, I'd recommend 
flattening the markup as much as possible, but it still just might not be 
possible.

I'm not sure that I understand all of your use cases, but, in general, the more 
you can do with adding non-hierarchical meta-fields and the less you have to 
hack markup, the better.  That said, it sounds like your problem is what the 
child/parent block join queries were built for, and given your response, it 
sounds like you've already gone that route and you've found performance not to 
be sufficient.

I'm sorry that I can't be of more help.

Best,

         Tim




-----Original Message-----
From: Darin McBeath [mailto:ddmcbe...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 1:03 PM
To: Allison, Timothy B.; java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpanQuery not working as expected

Thanks Tim.

I have thought about this for the author field (and like you suggest) it would 
probably work.  I was actually going to experiment with this later today.

But, I have another field that has a bit more nesting (and it contains authors)

For example, within a given document, I have the following:

References [ one or more]
  Authors [one or more]
     First Name
     Last Name

 
So, I would need to search for a specific author (matching first name and last 
name) within a specific reference for a document.  With this double level of 
nesting, I don't think the multivalued field approach would work (please 
correct me if I'm wrong).  That's why I decided to use span queries.  My index 
has more than 100 fields, but I only have 2 or 3 fields that require this 
structure search capability.  There are also many documents (100M) so I didn't 
really want to get into a parent-child type approach.

Plus, there are also many other fields (both within an author) and within an 
individual reference that need to be scoped.  For example, there is a 'source 
tittle' at the reference level and an 'article title' at the reference level. I 
would need to search within a given reference where the 'source title' contains 
some words, where the 'article title' contains some words, and within this 
reference where a specific author contains 'john' for the first name and 
'smith' in the last name.

I guess I'm curious if what I was doing with the SpanQuery should have worked, 
whether I misunderstood something, or if this is a bug.

Darin.




________________________________
From: "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org>
To: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" <java-user@lucene.apache.org>; Darin McBeath 
<ddmcbe...@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: SpanQuery not working as expected


Hi Darin,

Have you thought about using multivalued fields?  If you set the 
positionIncrementGap to something kind of big (well > 1, say :) ), and you know 
that your data is always authorfirst, authorlast,  you could just search for 
"darin fulford".

The positionincrementgap will prevent matching on doc2 below.

Doc1
Authorsfield:
    Darin fulford

Doc2 
Authorsfield:
    Matilda darin
    Fulford alexandria

Don't get me wrong, I love the capabilities of SpanQuery, but will this simple 
solution meet your needs?





-----Original Message-----
From: Darin McBeath [mailto:ddmcbe...@yahoo.com.INVALID] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 7:17 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SpanQuery not working as expected

I read through the http://searchhub.org/2009/07/18/the-spanquery/ which 
provided a good overview for how one can construct fairly complex span queries. 
 I was particularly interested in the ability to construct nested span queries. 
 I'm trying to apply this concept to search a field that contains some 
structure (as below).  I have a couple of other fields that will have a bit 
more nesting, but this should give the general idea.  

authors
  author [one or more]
    first name
    last name

Prior to indexing the content with Lucene, I added some 'markers' around the 
various bits I might want to search.  For example 'bauthor' implies beginning 
author, 'eauthor' implies ending author, and 'sauthor' implies a separator 
between individual authors (that would be used as part of the exclude clause in 
a not span query).  I do similar things for 'first name' and 'last name'.

My constructed query (as interpreted by Lucene) is included below.  This was 
extracted from the 'parsed string' returned from the query when I set 
debug=true.  Within a given 'authscope' field, I'm trying to find a situation 
where the author first name is 'darin' and the last name is 'fulford' within a 
given 'author'.   

spanNot(
    spanNear(
        [authscope:bauthor, 
        spanNear(
            [spanNot(
                spanNear(
                    [authscope:bfname, 
                    authscope:darin, 
                    authscope:efname], 
                    2147483647, true), 
                authscope:sfname, 0, 0), 
             spanNot(
                spanNear(
                    [authscope:blname, 
                    authscope:fulford, 
                    authscope:elname], 
                    2147483647, true), 
                authscope:slname, 0, 0)], 
             2147483647, false), 
         authscope:eauthor], 
         2147483647, true), 
     authscope:sauthor, 0, 0)",

I have loaded the following  2 documents into my index.

[
  {"id":"1", "authscope":" bauthors  bauthor blname mcbeath elname slname  
bfname  darin efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  fulford elname 
slname  bfname  darby efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  mcbeath 
elname slname  bfname  darby efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors 
"},
  {"id":"2", "authscope":" bauthors  bauthor blname  mcbeath elname slname  
bfname  darin efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  bauthor blname  fulford elname 
slname  bfname  darin efname sfname  eauthor sauthor  eauthors sauthors "}
]

What I can't figure out is why the above query would match on both documents.  
It should only match the document with id:2.


Any insights would be appreciated.  I'm using Lucene 4.7.2.

Darin.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to