Thank you Mike S for adding the 9.6.0 Milestone tag to the issue! I wonder if we are able to close an issue AND attach a milestone label in a commit message? I tried to research a bit and didn't find anything except all the synonyms for "closes": https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue
I'll start a separate thread ... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:28 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hello, > > That's a great question, and, looking through the GitHub PR that was > merged, it sure is hard to track down whether it was backported to 9.x and > exactly which release. > > In the Jira days we would have a clear "fix version" to make this clear. > How does one do this with GitHub issues? > > But digging in the commit logs, it looks to me like this fix will be > included in Lucene 9.6.x, the next feature release, which should be > released any day now (the release VOTE just passed yesterday). > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:01 AM external-opensource-requests(mailer list) > <external-opensource-reque...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Hello Michael >> >> >> >> The thread https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12226 seems to be >> Closed now and as per the updates to *Cleanup NOTICE.txt * >> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12227 - JUnit is not packaged in a >> Lucene release. >> >> But we can still see the Junit reference in Notices.txt file in maven for >> lucene components, for example >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-queries/4.10.4 >> and >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-backward-codecs/9.3.0 >> >> >> >> Hence, just wanted to confirm exactly which Lucene release is the >> update/pull request applied to? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Open Source Request Team >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> >> *Sent:* 06 April 2023 03:39 PM >> *To:* java-user@lucene.apache.org; external-opensource-requests(mailer >> list) <external-opensource-reque...@cisco.com> >> *Subject:* Re: Info required on licensing of Lucene component >> >> >> >> > In that case, can you’ll update your source repo for Lucene to exclude >> references to ‘junit’ from Notices.txt file since it is something which is >> not part of distribution for Lucene. >> >> >> >> That sounds reasonable to me. I'll open an issue in our GitHub repo, but >> IANAL and I'm not sure how to specifically proceed. >> >> >> >> I opened https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12226 -- let's continue >> discussion there? >> >> >> Thanks for raising this Open Source Request Team at Cisco! >> >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 7:58 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Lucene is licensed under the Apache license, just as it says in the >> LICENSE file. junit is used for testing Lucene and is not >> redistributed with it. Using Lucene in your code does not mean you are >> using junit, except in some extremely philosophical sense. EG Lucene >> developers may have developed Lucene using Windows on their laptops - >> that doesn't mean you need a WIndows license to use Lucene. IANAL, so >> you should ask yours - I'm sure someone at Cisco can help you sort >> this out? >> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:13 AM external-opensource-requests(mailer >> list) <external-opensource-reque...@cisco.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> > Hello Team >> > >> > I hope you are doing well!! >> > >> > This is regarding Lucene component licensing. >> > The maven repo link >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-queries/4.10.4 >> for lucene-queries 4.10.4 shows Apache 2.0 license associated with the >> component. >> > Also, the archive (lucene-queries-4.10.4-sources.jar) uploaded has a >> LICENSE.txt file which has Apache 2.0 license, but it also includes a >> NOTICE.txt file which shows JUnit (junit-4.10) licensed under the Common >> Public License v. 1.0. But there is no code associated with Junit included >> in the source archive (lucene-queries-4.10.4-sources.jar) file. >> > >> > In this case, since Common Public License 1.0 is more restrictive >> compared to Apache 2.0, for our better understanding, can you clarify to >> us on what is the actual Open Source license associated with the Lucene >> component? >> > >> > Mentioning just two of the lucene components in mail as example for >> your reference "lucene-backward-codecs 9.3.0" >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-backward-codecs/9.3.0 >> > >> > Looking forward to your reply. >> > >> > >> > Thanks , >> > Open Source Request Team >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
