> The memory-leaking behavior is not relevant for me > anymore since I changed the implementation to > MemoryImageSource already, but I am still curious if > anyone has an idea why setting pixels consumes that > much memory.
I would really recommend not using MemoryImageSource. Its an API from the java-1.1 days and its not recommended to use it any further. Its just there for compatibility reasons. Setting large amount of pixels using setRGB is not a good practise, best way is to directly grab the raster from a BufferedImage: [code] byte[] data=((DataBufferByte)tex.getRaster().getDataBuffer()).getData() [/code] this is for a byte-backed BufferedImage, but looks almost the same for an int[] one (which I recommend for best performance). lg Clemems [Message sent by forum member 'linuxhippy' (linuxhippy)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=269294 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
