Roland Jesse wrote:
>Why do you think this may not change in upcoming releases? Personally,
>I was never a big fan of this "backward compatibility for whatever the
>price is". And in this case, breaking with the current design just
>costs the application developer a couple of substitutions at the class
>definition level, doesn't it?
Well, yes, but I can't recall a situation where I've ever seen a base
class in a major API redefined.
I certainly think that with J3D most developers would accept a fairly
major rewrite of the API at some point. It's not as if there's a great
deal of code out there in the commercial domain.
Is it likely to happen? Is Bill Gates poor...?
Andrew
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
