Dominique Beauchamp wrote:
> If ObjectFile and LoaderBase both implement Loader, why is LoaderBase
> abstract? Is it a dummy?
There are a couple of methods that LoaderBase does not implement. In
principle, all that is does is fill in a bunch of the most common
methods that you normally would have to write yourself. So all it does
is save you a bit of time. It does not matter whether you start with the
Loader interface or LoaderBase abstract class as the basis for your
work.
--
Justin Couch http://www.vlc.com.au/~justin/
Freelance Java Consultant http://www.yumetech.com/
Author, Java 3D FAQ Maintainer http://www.j3d.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Humanism is dead. Animals think, feel; so do machines now.
Neither man nor woman is the measure of all things. Every organism
processes data according to its domain, its environment; you, with
all your brains, would be useless in a mouse's universe..."
- Greg Bear, Slant
-------------------------------------------------------------------
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
