Kasparian, Raffi J. wrote: > How much value to the community do you think it would it be if I wrote a > loader for 1.0?
I'm not sure. Are there any people that still use 1.0 files? Just thinking off the top of my head - it shouldn't be that hard to build another JavaCC grammar for 1.0 and include it within the current Xj3D code. That way, you could nominally build a format converter - read in 1.0, spit out 3.0 in XML format etc. The browser could inline files of all the different versions etc etc. If you want to have a crack at it, and include it in Xj3D, let me know privately. I'll give you some details about how to go about it. -- Justin Couch http://www.vlc.com.au/~justin/ Java Architect & Bit Twiddler http://www.yumetech.com/ Author, Java 3D FAQ Maintainer http://www.j3d.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Humanism is dead. Animals think, feel; so do machines now. Neither man nor woman is the measure of all things. Every organism processes data according to its domain, its environment; you, with all your brains, would be useless in a mouse's universe..." - Greg Bear, Slant ------------------------------------------------------------------- =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
