I can confirm that it is this commit: changeset: 48840:5e2d2067da48 tip user: ksrini date: 2018-02-09 13:58 -0800 8194651: javadoc: mark the com.sun.javadoc API for removal Reviewed-by: jjg
Advertising
that causes a build failure when rebuilding from scratch. I bisected my configure flags - it's the boot jdk bash ./configure --with-boot-jdk=/home/martin/jdk/jdk10 fails while bash ./configure --with-boot-jdk=/home/martin/jdk/jdk9 succeeds. Y'all are probably still using jdk9 as bootstrap. But as you all know, it's been the rule since time immemorial to use JDK N-1 to bootstrap JDK N. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Gibbons < jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> wrote: > Martin, > > I'm not hearing any CI alarm bells ringing here, and I've just completed a > clean build of the latest bits in jdk/jdk repo. > > There was a related javac fix that went back a few days ago, from Jan > Lahoda. Is it possible that either you didn't pick up that fix, or that you > have a locally modified copy of javadoc that needs to be updated? > > -- Jon > > > On 02/09/2018 04:06 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > This seems to break the build > > * For target buildtools_interim_langtools_modules_jdk.javadoc.interim__ > the.BUILD_jdk.javadoc.interim_batch: > /home/martin/ws/jdk/src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/com/sun/ > tools/javadoc/main/SourcePositionImpl.java:31: warning: [removal] > SourcePosition in com.sun.javadoc has been deprecated and marked for removal > import com.sun.javadoc.SourcePosition; > ^ > error: warnings found and -Werror specified > 1 error > 1 warning > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Jonathan Gibbons < > jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> OK >> >> -- Jon >> >> >> >> On 1/23/18 2:02 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please review fix for 8194651, https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/ >>> browse/JDK-8194651 >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8194651/webrev.01/ >>> >>> Please note this is blocked by: JDK-8194764 >>> >>> Thanks >>> Kumar >>> >> >> > >
