I went through the javadoc changes and, although I'm no javadoc expert,
they seem clean enough, to the point that I could follow the logic quite
easily.
One high-level gripe which is pointing at a failure of the j.l.model API
is the lack of a way to get to the canonical constructor directly; we
have this issue both in core reflection and source reflection, and I
think we should address that, as both serialization and javadoc has to
DYI around that.
Maurizio
On 17/10/2019 20:45, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
cc: javadoc-dev@openjdk.java.net
--Jon
On 10/17/2019 12:43 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
Hi,
Please review the javadoc code for JEP 359 (Records), this webrev
contains only the javadoc code as we have decided to split the new
code in clusters to make the review process easier.
Thanks in advance for the feedback,
Vicente
PS, Jon is the author of this code please keep him in the loop
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/records.review/javadoc/webrev.00/
