On Tue, 25 May 2021 17:39:13 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Although the `com.sun.tools.javadoc.**` packages were removed in >> JDK-8215584, some references to them remain, mainly in the form of links in >> doc comments. Some of those links refer to classes that never existed, which >> I reckon is due to a typo; for example, this reference >> >> com.sun.tools.javadoc.ClassDocImpl#findField >> >> should've looked like this >> >> com.sun.tools.javadoc.main.ClassDocImpl#findField >> >> Grep showed that some tests also use `com.sun.tools.javadoc` and some other >> extinct packages. However, it is unclear if those "references" should also >> be removed: >> >> 1. >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/739769c8fc4b496f08a92225a12d07414537b6c0/test/langtools/tools/javac/NoStringToLower.java#L60-L74 >> 2. >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/739769c8fc4b496f08a92225a12d07414537b6c0/test/langtools/tools/javac/T8003967/DetectMutableStaticFields.java#L73-L85 > > src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/api/JavacTrees.java line > 627: > >> 625: } >> 626: >> 627: /** @see com.sun.tools.javadoc.ClassDocImpl#findField */ > > Is there an equivalent new-style method that should be used instead? The most likely justification for all these ClassDocImpl references is now in `ReferenceTree`. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4192
