On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:49:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Pass through FIXMEs and TODOs
>>   
>>   Downgrades FIXMEs that do not mark *feature issues* to TODOs, or removes 
>> those FIXMEs completely. For example, unlike Style hierarchy, Action 
>> hierarchy won't benefit from becoming sealed. So the respective FIXME is 
>> removed.
>
> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/source/util/DocTreeScanner.java line 
> 513:
> 
>> 511: 
>> 512:     /**
>> 513:      * {@inheritDoc} This implementation scans the children in left to 
>> right order.
> 
> (minor)
> I would suggest/recommend a line-break after the `{@inheritDoc}`
> Likewise for similar occurrences elsewhere.

See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/4795#discussion_r694070081. Let's NOT 
do it in this PR.

> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/source/util/DocTreeScanner.java line 
> 516:
> 
>> 514:      *
>> 515:      * @param node  {@inheritDoc}
>> 516:      * @param p  {@inheritDoc}
> 
> Do you need the `{@inheritDoc}` ... isn't that the default behavior if no tag 
> is specified?
> 
> Likewise for similar occurrences elsewhere.

I don't think that I need `{@inheritDoc}` to inherit the comments in that and 
the similar cases in that file. I used that style because other parts of the 
file use it and I didn't want to update the file inconsistently. If we don't 
like that style, we are free to change it. That said, let's NOT do it in this 
PR.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4795

Reply via email to