On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:01:51 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/parser/DocCommentParser.java
>> line 923:
>>
>>> 921: * probably be considered on a case-by-case basis, for an
>>> attribute
>>> 922: * value of the {@snippet} tag we do not recurse.
>>> 923: */
>>
>> This discussion does not belong here.
>>
>> We should specify simple defensible rules (in the spec) and implement them
>> accordingly.
>> If there is nothing more obvious, I suggest the rules for (Unicode)
>> identifiers.
>
>> This discussion does not belong here.
>
> I've hoped to specify tag syntax before we push this PR. Until the syntax has
> been specified, the comment has to be stored somewhere. What would be an
> appropriate place to store that comment in?
>
>> I suggest the rules for (Unicode) identifiers
>
> What do those rules look like? Do you have a link handy?
Check `Character.isUnicodeIdentifierStart` / `Character.isUnicodeIdentifierPart`
Variant suggestion (if different) ... use the identifier rules for the name of
the attribute
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4795
