On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:07:16 GMT, Joe Darcy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Augmentations to javac's Xlint:serial checking are out for review (#5709) and > various javac and javadoc implementation libraries would need some changes to > pass under the expanded checks. > > The changes are to suppress warnings where non-transient fields in > serializable types are not declared with a type statically known to be > serializable. That isn't necessarily a correctness issues, but it does merit > further scrutiny. > > I'll run a script to update the copyright year before pushing. > > Sending this change out for review separately in an effort to de-bulk the > review needed for the new checks themselves. Is there any semantic difference between "not statically Serilizable" and "not a Serilizable type"? Also, there's a typo: Seri-a-lizable. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5728
