On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:11:24 GMT, Pavel Rappo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Is there any semantic difference between "not statically Serilizable" and > > > "not a Serilizable type"? Also, there's a typo: Seri-a-lizable. > > > > > > Same semantics. The first phase of this cleanup used "not statically > > Serilizable"; however, I thought "not a Serilizable type" is a more precise > > statement. I can make a pass over the PR and make the wording consistent in > > the new comments. > > You could update this PR if only to fix the typo; the phrasing is up to you. Wording updated. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5728
