Ah. I was misinformed. Shame to hear this was borked up like this.
Thanks for the info.

On Sep 20, 8:51 am, kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> > Ah, but, if they went after any old thing with 'java' in the name,
> > they would be. As I understand it, Sun pretty much went to JavaPolis,
> > told them that all they had to do was sign a document that hardly
> > limited them,
>
> I wish it had of been that easy for Javapolis. Without getting into
> details all I can say it that it wasn't. After two years of
> negotiations, no one, Sun nor Devoxx are happy that its ended this way.
>
> > However, javapolis didn't take the deal, probably because they were
> > already considering a rename. That's all.
>
> Not true. They had not intention of abandoning a well branded name that
> fits very will with what they are doing? Fact is, they  quickly changed
> from javoxx to devoox because they weren't interested in another
> protracted round of negotiations.
>
> JavaZone on the other hand, has much fewer aspirations than Javapolis
> did. It is my understanding that the agreement has now been inked.
>
> Regards,
> Kirk
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to