Yes. Except that runs on .NET and thus doesn't fit with "The WWW runs on Java" mantra that came out of the latest episode. At least now we know what's clogging the tubes then! lol
Btw. Microsoft haven't abandoned SOAP, but if you don't need WS* stuff (security, binary attachments, transaction semantic etc.) it would seem pretty attractive to go for a schemaless POX style to solve your problem. It is really no different than using Jersey with XML rather than JSON - and lets not forget there are things you can represent with XML which you can't represent with JSON (and vice versa). /Casper On Oct 31, 5:02 pm, CKoerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These are questions about the posse isn't it? I mean for just Java > related stuff wouldn't StacKOverflow.com be better? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
