That motorola demo works fine on the machine I'm on at the moment. And it's only Java is Java 1.5.0_06.
The only thing that demo lacked was a custom loading screen and removal of the stupid 'verify signed application' dialog. Its the tiny little things like this that really, really, really matter. On Nov 26, 6:27 am, carljmosca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chet Haase does a "comparison" here: > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/130608 > > On the issue of Java versions, Chet Haase asks/implies that JavaFX > will not run w/o the latest version of Java. > > Last time I checked, Apple had not yet released a 1.6.0_10 version > (and if they had/have, it's not on my Mac yet). Somehow this > demohttp://download.java.net/general/openjfx/demos/studiomoto.jnlp(and if > I recall the ones Josh Marinacci wrote) runs just fine. > > Overall the comparison seems to be a bit more forgiving of what Adobe > has "in development" vs. what Sun has "...not yet released." > > And of course I have never had to download and install Flash on my > Fedora machines...it's just there (yeah, right). > > no bias there :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
