Did you all see the following post about access JavaFX via groovy, quite interesting:
http://www.jroller.com/aalmiray/entry/javafx_java_groovy_example_with I like how the bound variables are transparently transformed as ObjectVariables with get/set methods. On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's possible but tricky. We are working on a sample that shows how to > do it. Your best bet is to make your FX class extend some Java > interface, like ActionListener, and then call only methods on that > interface. This way Java doesn't know that it's calling a non-Java > object. Also, null constructors will work on FX objects. > > -j > > > On Dec 5, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Alex Ruiz wrote: > > > It looks nice. But, how in the world can I call a JavaFX objects > > from Java? > > I'm trying to launch a JavaFX UI from the main method of a Java class. > > > > I found some articles/wiki pages on Google, but they seem to be > > outdated :( > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Bill Robertson < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >wrote: > > > >> > >> All in all, it rocks. I'm downloading the nb plugin. Now that its > >> here and its real, I'm looking forward to using it. > >> > >> Is there a full screen mode? e.g. for kiosks? > >> > >> I ran into a couple issues. (I am not complaining, but I thought you > >> might want to know.) I ran into the same Version "0" thing mentioned > >> above after removing all JDK/JRE installs and letting web download > >> attempt its magic. I downloaded an updated JDK/JRE bundle because I > >> was out of date anyway and all was better. I ran into a bit of a > >> weird issue in the site where I'd click to one of the sample pages > >> and > >> end up on a page that was blank except for a broken image on it. > >> Then > >> I'd hit back and end up on the sample page. > >> > >> On Dec 4, 11:55 pm, Matt Scully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> On Dec 4, 6:18 pm, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> the mp3 player dragging is a bug in my code that I didn't fix in > >>>> time. > >> > >>>> I'll be fixed in a refresh of the samples soon. > >>> > >>> Since other apps were dragging well, I was thinking it may be a bug. > >>> I'm sure it's been a long day with the launch, but good work. It > >>> will > >>> certainly be interesting to see how the JavaFX story unfolds. There > >>> is still a long way to go, but I was excited to see some good > >>> potential with these demos. Thanks! > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." -- Bill Harlan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
