s/proprietary/non standard/ :)
On Jan 13, 4:50 am, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is it fair to call an OSS solution "proprietary"?
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <
>
>
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello hello posses,
>
> > I am outraged. Nan I am kidding but I would like to clarify a bit what
> > was said about JSR 303 Bean Validation in the latest episode:
> > - the public draft is out and has been posted by JBoss, not Sun.
> > That's OK you did the same mistake last time. At least, you are
> > consistent ;)
> > - Bean Validation is long awaited by the community and its
> > proprietary equivalents (like Hibernate Validator and OVal) are alive,
> > kicking, widely used and deeply integrated with JPA, JSF and Seam to
> > provide consistent validation in all layers.
> > - Bean Validation's main goal is not to address pre-conditions per se
> > but an extension has been proposed in the spec after popular demand.
> > You can achieve Programming by contract with Bean Validation. Check
> > Appendix C of the public draft.
>
> > For more info on what's new in the spec, have a look at this blog
> > entry
> >http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/BeanValidationJSR303PublicDraftGiveUsF...
> > and give us feedback inhttp://forum.hibernate.org/viewforum.php?f=26.
>
> > Happy new year everyone and gang of four, keep up the good work.
>
> > Cheers
>
> > Emmanuel Bernard
> > JBoss
> > 303 spec lead
>
> --
> Viktor Klang
> Senior Systems Analyst
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
