Alas... a grey rectangle behind the shape of the player... On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Steven Herod <[email protected]>wrote:
> > The JavaFX docs note that the opacity attribute for stages only works > on 'supported platforms'. But fails to note what are the supported > platforms. > > If you go to the JavaFX demo site at http://www.javafx.com/ and look > at the music player demo, is that an irregular shaped player with a > transparent background, or does it have a colored rectangle behind it? > > On Jan 21, 7:35 pm, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm getting the same on Kubuntu (KDE4) - and also when running the JavaFX > > samples. There is no background transparency. So maybe it's not related > to > > WidgetFX... > > The toolbar icon's background is opaque too btw. > > > > Any plans about integrating with the KDE4 widgets ? ;-) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Tim Büthe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for that link. I tried it, but had no luck. Looks the same, > > > gray and no transparency at all. > > > > > I wonder if I have some weird Window-Manager configuration or > > > something. Is there nobody who can try this on Ubuntu by clicking > > >http://widgetfx.org/dock/launch.jnlpand tell me if it works? If > > > transparency is really not supported I can stop searching and just > > > wait... > > > > > Tim > > > > > On 20 Jan., 21:38, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's an early access, not beta, which can explain the AWT issue. You > > > > can get it here:https://jdk6.dev.java.net/6uNea.html > > > > > > /Casper > > > > > > On Jan 20, 8:56 pm, Tim Büthe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 20 Jan., 20:40, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Have you tried the latest beta of b12? It fixes a bunch of stuff > on > > > > > > Ubuntu in relation to browser integration and JavaFX stuff I > believe. > > > > > > Just be aware, there's an AWT deadlock issue with it so replace > it > > > > > > with the final as soon as its out. > > > > > > > Ah, no... I don't tried that one. In fact, I found today that there > is > > > > > an Update 11 and tried that. Where to get the beta release? Is this > > > > > OpenJDK aka IcedTea? I'm getting confused with all the versions > > > > > around, sorry. > > > > > > > That reminds me of the posse talking about how version numbering is > > > > > messed up and how to choose version number. In my opinion, the only > > > > > way to do it, is like Ubuntu does, timely. So the marketing guys > and > > > > > developers have nothing to argue about. > > > > > > > Tim > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
