But these examples don't show your typical "anonymous method closures"
- they demonstrate things like Comparators.  Which are standard.
Prosecution, I rest my case. :)

On Feb 5, 1:46 pm, Christian Catchpole <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Yeah I get that.  But say a closure is implemented as an interface
> with a method called 'closure', but someone else's implementation is a
> class with one method, who cares what it's called.
>
> I'm assuming this matters not at all because the code which defines
> the closure is the one which ends up calling it.
>
> I just flagging the possibility that it might cause problems that
> there is no 'real' closure definition.
>
> On Feb 5, 1:38 pm, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Oh the thing is it doesn't change the source AT ALL - its purely
> > visual code folding. So you open it up in emacs, it will look like
> > normal java etc... (in fact they would have the feature probably
> > turned off by default).
>
> > I repeat this does NOT change the source code. Its still the same
> > inner classes etc.
>
> > Christian Catchpole wrote:
> > > My first (and hopefully for your sake, last) question is..
>
> > > Regardless of how neat and cool any such implementation can be, do we
> > > loose the benefit of a standard "interoperability".  Or is the purpose
> > > of closures that the implementation is private?  Does it matter in
> > > practice?
>
> > > On Feb 5, 11:04 am, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Thought people may be interested in 
> > > > this:http://code.google.com/p/lambda4jdt/
>
> > > > and this:http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/IDEADEV-34469
>
> > > > (not sure if netbeans is thinking of the same).
>
> > > > Thoughts?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to