oh old man you are so out of date. These days we do this:
http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/apidocs/org/apache/xmlrpc/server/RequestProcessorFactoryFactory.html?rel=html RequestProcessorFactoryFactory.RequestSpecificProcessorFactoryFactory.getInstance ().sendMessage("Hello"); Credit to apache XMLRPC for that nugget of awesomeness On Feb 5, 3:03 pm, Christian Catchpole <[email protected]> wrote: > Haven't... coded.. in.. weeks...... Muuuust.. write.. coooode... > > System.out.println("That's better...."); > > On Feb 5, 2:00 pm, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Right - I misunderstood. I thought you had gone all soft in your > > management role ;) BOOYAA (sorry, low blow). > > > On Feb 5, 2:46 pm, Christian Catchpole <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Yeah I get that. But say a closure is implemented as an interface > > > with a method called 'closure', but someone else's implementation is a > > > class with one method, who cares what it's called. > > > > I'm assuming this matters not at all because the code which defines > > > the closure is the one which ends up calling it. > > > > I just flagging the possibility that it might cause problems that > > > there is no 'real' closure definition. > > > > On Feb 5, 1:38 pm, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Oh the thing is it doesn't change the source AT ALL - its purely > > > > visual code folding. So you open it up in emacs, it will look like > > > > normal java etc... (in fact they would have the feature probably > > > > turned off by default). > > > > > I repeat this does NOT change the source code. Its still the same > > > > inner classes etc. > > > > > Christian Catchpole wrote: > > > > > My first (and hopefully for your sake, last) question is.. > > > > > > Regardless of how neat and cool any such implementation can be, do we > > > > > loose the benefit of a standard "interoperability". Or is the purpose > > > > > of closures that the implementation is private? Does it matter in > > > > > practice? > > > > > > On Feb 5, 11:04 am, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thought people may be interested in > > > > > > this:http://code.google.com/p/lambda4jdt/ > > > > > > > and this:http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/IDEADEV-34469 > > > > > > > (not sure if netbeans is thinking of the same). > > > > > > > Thoughts? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
