That all sounds reasonable. Is this a commercial product you are working on? Could you email me directly with more info? I'd like to make sure your use case gets into the planning for Java 7 modularity support.
-Josh On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Brian Frank wrote: > >> So would the modularity efforts coming in Java 7 address some of >> these >> issues for you? > > The Java modularity work has changed directions a couple times, so I > am not completely sure what the current design is. But I think it can > go a long way to the solve the J2ME problem if the following holds > true: > > 1. The "kernel" is similar in size and scope to what J2ME is today > > 2. The modularity is granular enough that big subsystems like AWT, > Swing, and CORBA don't get sucked in because you wanted something from > NIO (just a silly example, but there are some weird package inter- > dependencies) > > 3. A suitable licensing model is provided such that you don't have to > ship a device with every J2SE module. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
