Technical merits aside, the OSGi advocates are really starting to piss me off. They go rant against anything that is even remotely like OSGi and they go rant against anything that doesn't use OSGi and could perhaps potentially use it. This is *not* a good way to advocate a technology.
On Mar 25, 5:37 pm, JodaStephen <[email protected]> wrote: > Joshua Marinacci said > "Jigsaw is the modularity planned to be built into the JDK. It's > purpose in life is to make the JRE modular. No other modules system, > including OSGI, has the ability to do that because they simply can't > work at a low enough level to make things work (such as JVM changes). > > Of course that conveniently ignores Apache Harmony, which is a JDK > modularised using OSGi. I think you'll find there are some deeper > forces going on here. > > phil.swenson said: > "jigsaw is core to Java 7 isn't it?" > > No. Jigsaw is core to JDK7, not Java7. Huge difference. > > Stephen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
