For a module system, I still prefer my childhood favourite: Lego(tm) On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Jess Holle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steve wrote: > > I know that Dick (and probably the rest of the posse) has had enough > of the discussion (can't blame them) however I suspect that an > interview with people from some of the major projects who are using > OSGi would provide more insight into why it is (or isn't) "important, > viable or worth caring" about than discussions with people from the > OSGi alliance or Jigsaw. > > > Yes, OSGi is hugely important in some subspaces of Java right now, but... > > Jigsaw and OSGi aren't targeted at the same problem space. > > It really seems like *some* OSGi supporters are disturbed that there might > be another (almost certainly simpler) solution to part of the problem space > in the future. > > I certainly do understand concerns about how OSGi and Jigsaw are *really > *going > to work together, though. > > -- > Jess Holle > > > > > -- Viktor Klang Scala Loudmouth --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
