Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > I'm looking around for online project hosting, and frankly, I'm not > really finding the perfect solution. > [...] > sourceforge: Vague sense of being from the 90s (-), Supports git (++), > no wiki (-), not so nice homegrown issue tracker (-). > Not that I would really recommend SF, but nowadays you get trac and some other hosted applications with it if you want it. In fact IIRC they are intending to throw out their own tracker in favour of the other tools.
See http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Hosted%20Apps But OTOH their design goes from one mediocre look to the next and it seems to get harder and harder to use. In the latest version the only place I can find the project's license information is in the admin section, which is not that useful if you are not an admin. The trac sites get an extra SF banner at the top. Since you can register the trac frontpage as project homepage it is not that bad, though. It means http://${project}.sf.net ends there, as well as any vhosts you might have configured. If you can live with their poor attempts at revamping themselves every now and then, SF is probably a decent option again. No idea how they are going to evolve, though. Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
