Or Maybe - (in which case you don't care about the None case, you just need to handle it).
On Aug 18, 6:43 pm, Peter Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > In Scala you get the Either type. That is superior for most cases where > one might use checked exceptions in Java. > > I have used that style in Java, but you usually don't make friends with it. > > Peter > > > > Michael Neale wrote: > > What do people think of the scala approach of no checked exceptions - > > even checked exceptions are not treated specially by the constructor > > (personally, I like it). > > > On Aug 18, 12:55 pm, Christian Catchpole <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> No, i just let that go up. I really try to avoid the declare as null > >> then set thingy. > > >> On Aug 18, 12:03 pm, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> You neglect to handle the checked exception declared by > >>> prepareStatement no? > > >>> PreparedStatement stmt = null; > >>> try{ > >>> stmt = connection.prepareStatement(sql); > >>> final ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(); > >>> try{ > >>> while (rs.next()){ > >>> // Stuff... > >>> { > >>> } > >>> finally{ > >>> rs.close(); > >>> }} > > >>> catch(SQLException e){ > >>> // Logging...} > > >>> finally{ > >>> try{ > >>> stmt.close(); > >>> } > >>> catch(SQLException whoTheFuckCares){ > >>> }; > > >>> } > > >>> Really, how many other ways are there to do it I wonder now? (Apart > >>> from wrapping certain things, like the last try-catch clause in some > >>> general purpose "closer util"?). > > >>> /Casper --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
