If I have misunderstood something, I am not alone in this, as the editor publicaly writes "At the time of that poll, the specific features that will be included in JDK had not been finalized. Now that the list is out, it's a perfect time get people's reassessed view of the JDK".
You will kindly correct us if this perception is wrong? --- Sent from my G2, pardon any typos. On Sep 5, 1:37 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Well we now know the upper bound of the subset that could possibly > make it in, no? That's what I though anyway. You'd know that better > than me so correct me if I am wrong. > > /Casper > > On 5 Sep., 03:24, Alex Buckley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have to ask: how is it different > > tohttp://java.net/poll/whats-your-view-emerging-jdk-7 > > ? > > > On Sep 4, 5:20 pm, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Java 7, public speak for JDK7 and thus not only the Coin stuff. Things > > > are somewhat reversed as we don't have an umbrella JSR (yet?). > > > > /Casper > > > > On 5 Sep., 02:12, Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Was the poll trying to determine a response to all jdk7 features - > > > > there are some significant ones, e.g. JSR-203 - or just the project > > > > coin ones? > > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Casper Bang<[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Poll is now running on java.net: > > > > >http://www.java.net/poll/what-your-reaction-jdk-7-feature-list > > > > > > /Casper --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
