So, after careful review of all the posts in this thread, I seem to have misjudged Fabrizio's support for the democratic model. I'll leave the previous post primarily for my point about how the failure of the BGGA proposal is not good marketing for community experiments based around javac-based prototyping. It also ought to go without saying that I'm biased, as developer of projectlombok.org
On Sep 5, 4:51 am, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 3, 1:44 pm, jddarcy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > After listening to episode 277, I'm led to conclude I'm thought of by > > some as one of the "ivory tower guys" who "just says no" to ideas > > about changing the Java programming language. > > I am pretty sure they weren't referring to you or people like you at > all - more to the "paper tiger" style architects from The Enterprise > (and not the starship). (probably should make your post into a blog ! > which I think someone suggested). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
