I'm not sure I can agree with this. I find the lack of type safety in spring frustrating, though a good IDE can help compensate for this, but the benefits of DI IMHO far outweigh the draw backs. Generally i would prefer to use annotations and java based config where possible, but the are times when separating config from code is really helpful.
Alex Sent from my iPod On Sep 26, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Mwanji Ezana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 26 sep, 18:12, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Bottom line, I don't like the magic introduced by many of the >> frameworks if I can have a clean and simple (type-safe) Java API to >> explore through my favorite IDE. > > Exactly! I think all configuration, templating, etc. should be done in > Java for precisely those reasons. Maybe component-oriented frameworks > are closer to this, but action-oriented frameworks tend to fall very > short of the mark. > > Moandji > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
