I agree.  It's about time they addressed the deployment part of the
development lifecycle for services/daemons.

I also use JSW, and it's been pretty good, but they went GPL (to their
everlasting shame).  YAJSW (http://yajsw.sourceforge.net/) looks
interesting, but it seems immature.

On Oct 30, 9:56 am, Marc E <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alan,
>   I'm using tanuki's wrapper as well, for applications that don't run
> in a container. I've been wondering the same thing: whether there's a
> better way of doing this. Thanks for posting the question and I hope
> others chime in, if better solutions do exist.
>
> On Oct 29, 9:44 pm, Alan Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Alan Kent wrote:
> > > A pity its not an executable shipped with the standard Java
> > > distribution.  Makes it that bit easier getting Java apps deployed onto
> > > Windows servers.
>
> > I should have probably explained - the whole rest of the system is
> > platform neutral (all written in Java).  Having to include a Wrapper
> > executable for Windows, shell scripts for Unix, etc makes deployment
> > that little bit harder.  It would be lovely if all the OS dependent
> > stuff was supplied by Java instead (which has platform specific
> > downloads already) instead of having to do platform specific application
> > builds.
>
> > Alan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to