Oh, and another thing. The current crop of Flex apps has demonstrated that having a native L&F isn't really necessary for many kinds of apps, so it's probably better to go with something that looks good vs. some half-assed emulation of native widgets (i.e., Nimbus is beautiful). -Mario.
-- I want to change the world but they won't give me the source code. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:30, Mario Camou <[email protected]> wrote: > The big problem I see with SWT is the native parts (DLL, .so, etc), which > means that an SWT app can't be easily deployed, for example, through > WebStart or as an applet (without having to preinstall shared libs). That is > a killer for some range of apps (one of which I'm working on right now). Of > course, I could be wrong and would appreciate being corrected. > -Mario. > > -- > I want to change the world but they won't give me the source code. > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 15:26, a.efremov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> How you feel about SWT and its future in enterprise java on desktop? >> SWT application has native look and feel and integrates seamlessly >> with user's environment. I mean compared to as Swing application does. >> >> will be glad to hear your feedbacks. >> >> alexander >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
