lambdaj already has been discussed in the Posse's Google Group: http://j.mp/4k8lbS
A notable addition: The TSS article "lambdaj 2.0 brings (almost) real closures to Java" by lambdaj-developer Mario Fusco > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=57148 ... and the debate triggered by Neal Gafter's article comment: > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=57148#319629 regards, fbahr --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
