Looks like adding
http://deadlock.netbeans.org/hudson/job/nbms-and-javadoc/lastStableBuild/artifact/nbbuild/nbms/updates.xml.gzmight
actually bring back uml, vsf and soa. Not tried it yet though...

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 18:33, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is it possible it is the default page with a new banner on top ? The window
> title in the screenshot is "Netbeans 6.5".
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:46, rastrano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> from
>>
>> http://netbeans.org/features/uml/index.html
>>
>> "(NetBeans UML Plugin
>> The NetBeans UML plugin is available from the Plugin Manager (Tools >
>> Plugins).)"
>>
>>
>> really?
>>
>>
>> On 11 Dic, 22:30, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Jesus, Tim. I just finished yelling at some other paranoid nutcase for
>> > blaming this on sun/oracle. Sit down, and listen.
>> >
>> > Oracle hasn't bought sun YET. The SEC would get rather extremely
>> > concerned if oracle has already been telling sun to deep-six a bunch
>> > of FOSS competition, and has apparently done so a while ago, because
>> > stuff like this doesn't happen overnight. Also, considering that
>> > oracle can't get their hands on sun until the EU clears it, and if
>> > there's any hint of official communication by oracle to sun to kill
>> > off FOSS-based competition to oracle projects, well, think about it.
>> >
>> > THEY WOULD BE SUNK.
>> >
>> > The EU would sit there, smugly say: Ha! Told you so, veto to the deal,
>> > and make clear no amount of political pressure is going to change this
>> > answer. This, or even an investigation if that happened, would cost
>> > oracle hundreds of millions of dollars. Most assuredly more than
>> > whatever sales oracle would lose in the few months that it'll take for
>> > the oracle/sun deal to go through now, at which point they can axe
>> > whatever projects they want.
>> >
>> > So, no, oracle did not sabotage SOA, UML, and the visual web plugins.
>> > Duh.
>> >
>> > Secondly, these plugins did exist, and they are open source. If there
>> > is truly such financial benefit in these products, then why, exactly,
>> > aren't the businesses that rely on them putting in some funds and a
>> > programmer or two to maintain these plugins? All they'd have to do is
>> > maintain existing code. It's not as bad as having to start from
>> > scratch. A post on the netbeans forum (check other thread for link)
>> > clearly shows that if anybody else puts in the effort of maintaining
>> > these plugins, odds are they'll find a place in the master
>> > distributions, or at the very least, they'd get whatever help they
>> > needed from Team Netbeans. Team Netbeans has also been adding J2EE6
>> > support to netbeans, which i'm sure competes with oracle stuff as
>> > well. The fact that you cannot see that this ISNT some sort of
>> > powerplay is mind boggling to me.
>> >
>> > On Dec 11, 2:59 pm, Tim Davenport <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Unfortunatly SOA, UML and Visual Web plugins are unfunded and will not
>> > > be released going forward,
>> > > The conspiracy theorist in me knows that the free SUN, SOA especially,
>> > > solution were as good or better than the Oracle offerings which cost
>> > > 100's of thousands of dollars to license in production.
>> > > The take over of SUN by Oracle has reduced the competition in the
>> > > market, not a good situation and I ask the question
>> > > Why would Oracle fund open source projects that compete with their pay
>> > > for products??
>> >
>> > > RIP Sun!!
>> > > RIP Netbeans!
>> >
>> > > On Dec 3, 6:31 pm, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > figures... not very active apparently. :-(  A pity really because
>> it's a
>> > > > great product.
>> >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 09:33, Jan Goyvaerts <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > (please disregard my previous message... pressed by accident on
>> the tab key
>> > > > > again...)
>> >
>> > > > > Hello Java people,
>> >
>> > > > > Does anybody in here knows what the plans are for the uml plugin
>> of
>> > > > > netbeans ? I'm trying to install it on netbeans 6.8 but that's not
>> working.
>> > > > > And I've got the impression it's not exactly active these days...
>> >
>> > > > > I really hope it's going to be released for as long as Netbeans'll
>> around.
>> >
>> > > > > Jan
>>
>> --
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The Java Posse" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.


Reply via email to