On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 15:50, Dereck Haskins <[email protected]> wrote: > But the statement that only de Icaza is the only one doing interesting > things with .NET is just plain crap. > [...] > Finally, your separation of "non-tech" from "tech" professionals does not > hold up under scrutiny.
I fully agree with you that this is not a proper/full/correct description of the market situation. > The turn-around time for ASPX/IIS projects from India is amazing; > meaning that they can perform the work on a ASPX front-end 3-4 times to get > it right in .NET in the time it takes to edit the XML configurations for > J2EE. Don't compare apples with bananas! You should compary ASPX with JSP or Wicket or Vaadin or some other recent framework intended for the same audience/developers - not with J2EE (which is a completely different story - IMHO)! > [Yes, I know, probably not in Spring. Irrelevant conversation. > Corporate would demand the full J2EE stack.] I think this is just because of the history (that many bigger companies already use that stack). I don't think that some agile startup or middle sized company would necessarily choose a full J2EE stack. Indeed when blaming Java, people argue about J2EE, JSF mainly. But I am lately playing around a little with Wicket for example which is a completely different and clean approach. -- Martin Wildam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
