>"... get bits and pieces added for months before we've got anything >useful."
Have you got any insight on why the first few deliveries were not useful? I thought the point of phased delivery was that it did put something useful out there early. Do you think that maybe the functionality chosen for the first delivery was incorrect? Or that maybe it was just too soon, so customers only saw foundations being laid? Or was the customer who mentioned it was not the focus of early releases, and wasn't aware other users did receive useful functionality? Or do you find it's a general perception that if the software doesn't do everything it's not useful? Sorry, a ton of questions I know, but I'm soon going to be working in an Agile shop, and would be interested to hear more about user's perceptions of it. Kind regards, Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
