Very interesting reply my friend.

So could we think of such a mechanism or concept.

Regards,
JD

On 5/25/10, Steel City Phantom <[email protected]> wrote:
> friend of mine did an image search engine using this once
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/joone/
>
> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/joone/>he said it was a major pain and
> training the network was one of the most complex things he has ever done.
>  but he said it worked out not so bad.  some of the older c++ neural
> networks frameworks are much more advanced but this worked for images.
>
> but to the best of my knowledge neural networks are the closest thing to
> cognitive thinking AI's there really are.
>
> i do remember an interesting company several years ago that designed a
> neural network that allowed them to systematically break connections in the
> network.  they called it a thinking program (but it really wasn't).  say
> your a song writer that is having writing block.  they would load the lyrics
> of every song imaginable into the neural network and systematically start
> breaking connections in the network and see how it reconnects the orphaned
> data into the network.  then when they got to a critical mass they would
> look at it and see how it reconnected the words.  most of it was jibberish
> but sometimes it came up with good ideas.  when i saw the report they said
> Crest had used them to brainstorm about a new toothbrush (made sense, how
> many ways can  you make a toothbrush?) and the result was the inspiration
> for the Crest Reach toothbrush.
>
> as far as cognitive thinking AI's i was watching an interesting show on the
> history channel not to long ago about robots.  this researcher at MIT was on
> it and he said as far as cognitive decision making for autonomous robots
> (say data on star trek, IRobot, C3PO, R2D2, etc ) about 30 years ago MIT
> made a bunch of autonomous, cognitive thinking robots that were able to
> realize they walked into a wall and cognitively back up and walk another
> direction without walking into another wall.  he said the dirty little
> secret of cognitive thinking engines is the only difference between then and
> now is today they put sensors on the little robots so they figure out they
> are about to walk into a wall before they actually do.  he said they damage
> less robots that way.  he said the problem is we havn't invented a language
> or database yet that can think.  we have stuff that can statistically
> anticipate, but not think.
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:12 AM, jitesh dundas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Kevin and Peter for the replies.
>>
>> Peter,I haven't just changed the subjects. This is something seriously
>> persued by scientists.
>> Maybe Java could be used for the thinking  mechanisms.
>> Every action is a result of a complex algorithm being executed. In our
>> case,the algorithm is very complex and evolved.
>> Getting a simulator ready of the level of a rat/cat is is indeed
>> significant.
>>
>> As time goes by,we will see more of such  inventions.
>>
>> I was wondering how could thinking be influenced by Java.
>> Is Java giving the entire set of functionality to do such things .Or
>> do we need another language  for this.
>>
>> Java for AI would be pretty cool. I came across several simulations
>> but I would really give Kevin's idea a deep thought.
>>
>> Regards,
>> jd
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The Java Posse" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> You want it fast, cheap, or right.  Pick two!!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to