well these machines do have 500,000 years of evolution to catch up on, the analogy i recall was these system are like single cell organisms that we need to force evolve.
Regards Shaine Ismail On 25 May 2010 14:30, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > I also studied hypermedia and here 10 years after I have yet to be > convinced that the theory can map to practice (i.e. bidirectional > links, annotations etc.) If anyone can bring this forward in practice, > it has got to be Google. And yet, look at how crappy live translation > of captions works for YouTube. That part will be particular > interesting to monitor when GoogleTV launches. > > On May 25, 3:17 pm, shainnif ismail <[email protected]> wrote: > > I went to a talk at Edinburgh University many years ago, about > > Neurolinguistics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurolinguistics) > > > > specifically on Semantics, and its use in computer science eg > > translating human language to code using intelligent programs, mapping > > concepts rather than words. > > > > It remember being very impressed and that was about 1999. > > > > shaine > > > > On 25 May 2010 13:56, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's an interesting subject for sure, dating back to Plato Vs. > > > Aristotle. I used to believe futurists like Ray Kurzweil etc. but now > > > I am not so sure. While we will no doubt continue to simulate larger > > > and more complex brains, we have yet to properly define intelligence > > > let alone self-awareness (humans primary driver). > > > > > Nature itself does not seem particular intelligent, it relies on crude > > > trial-n-error (survival-of-the-fittest) and tracer-bullets (mutations) > > > rather than up-front design. Indeed, modern agile processes looks an > > > awful lot like a step back to nature. > > > > > The fact that you can hire 100 teams to solve a problem* and they will > > > all get to very different solutions, suggests to me that it makes > > > little sense to equate computer intelligence and human intelligence. > > > When all 100 teams start to arrive at the (very near) same solution, > > > then we may be more ready to define "intelligence". > > > > > /Casper > > > > > *Not a pure algorithmic problem a la TSP. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "The Java Posse" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > <javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
