What can I say, I'm a militant atheist.

I genuinely feel that acknowledging your atheism is the only wise choice.
After all, give me any person on the planet and I bet you I can find at
least one deity they don't believe in.
So we're all atheists really of one kind or another, it's easier to just
accept the fact :)


On 26 May 2010 18:23, jitesh dundas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hahaha,
>
> Really..That is quite an expression..
>
> I am a Science student and I think science only..I welcome your
> opinions Rakesh, that will bring some good pointers for us to
> discuss..I don't believe I aimed at hijacking your thread.That thought
> is so narrow-minded..In any case, please go ahead  and say whatever
> you want..You are most welcome...:)
>
> Btw,thanks for the nominations,I guess I will be famous now..Only
> now,I would like to learn more about science from what you say.
>
> Again, your point about evolution and all..I stand by what I said. Anyways,
> thanks for the constructive information.
>
> I think computers could understand such a situation someday and if
> they do, they do, t at will truly be human like thinking..
>
> Thanks Kevin for your  interesting reply.
>
> Regards,
> jd
>
> On 5/26/10, Rakesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > hey, this hijacking someone else's thread into a random direction is
> > fun! Sorry, I complained before.
> >
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Rakesh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> if computers gained sentience, they would be worse than the Nazis.
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin Wright
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> I thought the rule was you couldn't claim that until someone's been
> >>> compared
> >>> to Hitler and/or the Nazis
> >>>
> >>> On 26 May 2010 17:03, Rakesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Jitesh,
> >>>>
> >>>> "Intelligent Design" is a theory, created by Creationists to denounce
> >>>> Evolution.
> >>>>
> >>>> I nominate this post to be the most pointless and ill-conceived in the
> >>>> history of threads ever.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rakesh
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:55 PM, jitesh dundas <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > Actually Kevin, this supports the intelligent design t
> >>>> > eory..Evolution is the next step in product of intelligent behavior.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > No wonder computers are becoming smarter with our support.
> >>>> > However, evolution in computers will be the point when we can call
> >>>> > computers equal to us ...long way to go..lbut intelligence  &
> software
> >>>> > development ,well that should be not far away ....
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I request replies in this direction...
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Regards,
> >>>> > jd
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 5/25/10, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> >> So we can't just create these things, we have to evolve them.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> You know... this really screws with the "intelligent design" theory
> >>>> >> :)
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On 25 May 2010 14:50, shainnif ismail <[email protected]>
> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> well these machines do have 500,000 years of evolution to catch up
> >>>> >>> on,
> >>>> >>> the
> >>>> >>> analogy i recall was these system are like single cell organisms
> >>>> >>> that
> >>>> >>> we
> >>>> >>> need to force evolve.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Regards
> >>>> >>> Shaine Ismail
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> On 25 May 2010 14:30, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> I also studied hypermedia and here 10 years after I have yet to
> be
> >>>> >>>> convinced that the theory can map to practice (i.e. bidirectional
> >>>> >>>> links, annotations etc.) If anyone can bring this forward in
> >>>> >>>> practice,
> >>>> >>>> it has got to be Google. And yet, look at how crappy live
> >>>> >>>> translation
> >>>> >>>> of captions works for YouTube. That part will be particular
> >>>> >>>> interesting to monitor when GoogleTV launches.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> On May 25, 3:17 pm, shainnif ismail <[email protected]>
> >>>> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>>> > I went to a talk at Edinburgh University many years ago, about
> >>>> >>>> > Neurolinguistics (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurolinguistics)
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > specifically on Semantics, and its use in computer science eg
> >>>> >>>> > translating human language to code using intelligent programs,
> >>>> >>>> > mapping
> >>>> >>>> > concepts rather than words.
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > It remember being very impressed and that was about 1999.
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > shaine
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > On 25 May 2010 13:56, Casper Bang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > > It's an interesting subject for sure, dating back to Plato
> Vs.
> >>>> >>>> > > Aristotle. I used to believe futurists like Ray Kurzweil etc.
> >>>> >>>> > > but
> >>>> >>>> > > now
> >>>> >>>> > > I am not so sure. While we will no doubt continue to simulate
> >>>> >>>> > > larger
> >>>> >>>> > > and more complex brains, we have yet to properly define
> >>>> >>>> > > intelligence
> >>>> >>>> > > let alone self-awareness (humans primary driver).
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > > Nature itself does not seem particular intelligent, it relies
> >>>> >>>> > > on
> >>>> >>>> > > crude
> >>>> >>>> > > trial-n-error (survival-of-the-fittest) and tracer-bullets
> >>>> >>>> > > (mutations)
> >>>> >>>> > > rather than up-front design. Indeed, modern agile processes
> >>>> >>>> > > looks
> >>>> >>>> > > an
> >>>> >>>> > > awful lot like a step back to nature.
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > > The fact that you can hire 100 teams to solve a problem* and
> >>>> >>>> > > they
> >>>> >>>> > > will
> >>>> >>>> > > all get to very different solutions, suggests to me that it
> >>>> >>>> > > makes
> >>>> >>>> > > little sense to equate computer intelligence and human
> >>>> >>>> > > intelligence.
> >>>> >>>> > > When all 100 teams start to arrive at the (very near) same
> >>>> >>>> > > solution,
> >>>> >>>> > > then we may be more ready to define "intelligence".
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > > /Casper
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > > *Not a pure algorithmic problem a la TSP.
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > > --
> >>>> >>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >>>> >>>> > > Google
> >>>> >>>> Groups
> >>>> >>>> > > "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> >>>> > > To post to this group, send email to
> >>>> >>>> > > [email protected].
> >>>> >>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> >>>> > >
> >>>> >>>> > > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%[email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> >
> >>>> >>>> <javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> >>>> >>>> > > .
> >>>> >>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> >>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>> >>>> >
> >>>> >>>> > --
> >>>> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >>>> >>>> > Google
> >>>> >>>> Groups "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> >>>> > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >>>> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%[email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> >
> >>>> >>>> .
> >>>> >>>> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> >>>> >>>> groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> --
> >>>> >>>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> >>>> >>>> Groups "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%[email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> >
> >>>> >>>> .
> >>>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>  --
> >>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> >>> Groups
> >>>> >>> "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%[email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> >
> >>>> >>> .
> >>>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> Kevin Wright
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> mail/google talk: [email protected]
> >>>> >> wave: [email protected]
> >>>> >> skype: kev.lee.wright
> >>>> >> twitter: @thecoda
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> >> Groups
> >>>> >> "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> >> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> >>>> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> > Groups "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> >>>> > For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups
> >>>> "The Java Posse" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kevin Wright
> >>>
> >>> mail/google talk: [email protected]
> >>> wave: [email protected]
> >>> skype: kev.lee.wright
> >>> twitter: @thecoda
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "The Java Posse" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Kevin Wright

mail/google talk: [email protected]
wave: [email protected]
skype: kev.lee.wright
twitter: @thecoda

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to